Fairness , Adverse Selection , and Employment

نویسندگان

  • Björn Bartling
  • Florian Englmaier
  • Robert Evans
  • Ernst Fehr
  • Sten Nyberg
  • Sven Rady
  • Markus Reisinger
چکیده

This paper considers a firm whose potential employees have private information on both their productivity and the extent of their fairness concerns. Fairness is modelled as inequity aversion, where fair-minded workers suffer if their colleagues get more income net of production costs. Screening workers with equal productivity but different fairness concerns is shown to be impossible if both types are to be employed, thereby rendering the optimal employment contracts discontinuous in the fraction of fair-minded workers. As a result, fairness might influence the employment contracts of all workers although only some are fair-minded, and identical firms facing very similar pools of workers might employ very different remuneration schemes. JEL: C70, D21, D42, D63, D82, J31

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Inequity Aversion , Adverse Selection and Employment Contracts ∗

This paper analyzes the interaction of fairness concerns and social comparisons with asymmetric information and incentives within the context of a firm’s employment decision. It studies optimal, incentive-compatible employment contracts if each worker is inequity averse he suffers from being ‘worse off’ than his colleagues and has private information about his productivity. Inequity aversion is...

متن کامل

‘‘I Think They Discriminated Against Me’’: Using Prototype Theory and Organizational Justice Theory for Understanding Perceived Discrimination in Selection and Promotion Situations

Research in industrial/organizational (I/O) psychology has generally focused on objective measures of employment discrimination and has virtually neglected individuals’ subjective perceptions as to whether a selection or promotion process is discriminatory or not. This paper presents two theoretical models as organizing frameworks to explain candidates’ likelihood of perceiving that discriminat...

متن کامل

Perceived Fairness of Web-based Applicant Screening Procedures: Weighing the Rules of Justice and the Role of Individual Differences

Researchers have increasingly recognized the importance of applicant perceptions during the selection process and have investigated fairness perceptions related to applicant selection systems in particular (e.g., Ryan & Ployhart, 2000; Rynes, 1993; Steiner & Gilliland, 1996). Applicant screening is the first stage of a selection process, and applicant screening systems refer to procedures organ...

متن کامل

Psychological Testing in Personnel Selection: Contemporary Issues in Cognitive Ability and Personality Testing

This paper examines the development of personnel selection testing from the late 19th century to the present, emphasizing general cognitive ability and personality testing. The development of methods and standards in employment testing is examined with particular emphasis on selection validity and utility. The issues of fairness and discrimination in cognitive ability selection testing are expl...

متن کامل

Insurance as a Giffen Good under a Bonus-Malus System and its Effect on Adverse Selection

A bonus-malus system (BMS) serves not only as a fair rating system but also as a mechanism to avoid adverse selection by developing an applied premium based on the claim experience of a policy. This paper analyzes how a BMS could work for these two concepts: achieving fairness among policies and mitigating adverse selection. The purpose is to understand how the transition rules, the number of c...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005